The World Trade Center — in Peril?!

I’m going to cut to the chase: here’s what you need to do now, and then you can come back and read all the verbiage and look at the pretty pictures. Go email eabrown@calhfa.ca.gov at the CA Housing Finance Agency by end of day 5/13 — and say “I care about Tony Sheets’ History of World Commerce and pedway access and want them preserved and accessible in the Sky Tower Project!”

The World Trade Center! Important! Incredible! And…doomed? Well, no, but…sort of?

You know about the World Trade Center because you have undoubtedly been there to marvel at its wonders, but if you haven’t, you’ve at least seen it in the book Bunker Hill, Los Angeles

…and in the book Marsak’s Guide to Bunker Hill

…but should you not be familiar with the wonders of the World Trade Center, let me bring you, quickly, up to speed:

Once upon a time, the Bunker Hill redevelopment area superblock bounded by Third, Fig, Fourth & Flower was slated as site of “The Bunker Hill Center” retail mall, and then the “Los Angeles International Financial Center,” and wound up as The World Trade Center, for reasons I won’t go into here, but you can read all about it in this Instagram post. (While we’re on the subject of Instagram, I would suggest you go to amazing bonaventurehotel fan page, specifically their three recent WTC-related posts here, here, and here.)

Anyway, the World Trade Center opens in January 1975. It is a development by Edward K. Rice, who was chairman of the board of Conrad Associates, the Van Nuys architectural firm who designed the $30-million complex. Rice was an absolute titan when it came to concrete innovation, at least on par with Whittlesey.

Point being, the World Trade Center exists. It is one of the strangest, most wonderful, and sublime spaces in Los Angeles. For now. Check it out:

No idea who these three are; all I know is the negative sleeve is marked “World Trade Center 8-7-79.” I do know that it was August 1979 when WTC Associates sold the building to Equitec Properties, so maybe these are Equitec folk. So then why are they looking up Flower Street? They are pointing vaguely up toward the site of the Promenade condo complex, which broke ground in mid-1980, so perhaps they’re from Goldrich & Kest. If you have an idea, share it!

Ok, maybe you’re not wowed by Late-Modern Sculpturist glass skin towers. Fine. Let’s go inside then:

Yes, I know, there’s no people there. Everyone always calls that out. There’s a certain strain of urbanist (who no-one likes, but somehow makes all the rules) that decries any opportunity to have elbow room. These elite echochamber activists impose high-density confinement upon the population under the guise of “sustainability” because apparently it’s Opposite Day. Point being, I always found the open space here (hard to do, in America’s densest city) immensely restorative.

It’s an absolutely transcendent space, one of the great intact 1970s lobbies. I know, people my age might scoff at the prospect that 1970s architecture is cool, but the kids (can we still call Millennials kids?) love the stuff. The WTC lobby is within spitting distance (or, in this case, pedway distance) of 1970s interiors found in the Bonaventure Hotel and Bank of America (née Security Pacific), truly some of the best in the world. But this one has Tony Sheets:

This is a five-foot-high, 1000-foot-long poured-in-place concrete mural about the development of mercantile trade, called The History of World Commerce. This is Sheets’ masterpiece. In 2019, back when Jamison was going to build a residential tower on the site, an assessment was made of the building: it stated that because the artwork wasn’t fifty years old, and the artist was still alive, it wasn’t eligible to be considered for…anything. Of course, now the artwork is fifty years old, and Tony Sheets is deceased. But someone may read the report and descriptions of History of World Commerce featuring lines like “it does not articulate a particular, unique concept of design that would lead it to express an aesthetic ideal or high artistic value” which is embarrassingly stupid. In fact, the report goes on to say that post-redevelopment Bunker Hill is not a significant or distinguishable entity, and its components lack individual distinction. Which resets the bar for embarrassingly stupid.

Check out this part: at left, there’s the World Trade Center, the Bonaventure, and the Union Bank building, because Bunker Hill is part of the history of world commerce!

Flash forward to today. 2019’s residential tower is dead, but the City (despite Los Angeles leading the nation in numeric population loss) says we need housing! So, they’re turning it into a public housing project: 512 subsidized units to the tune of $104million ($203,000 a unit). The effort, according to Mayor Bass, is to “continue decreasing homelessness,” but this sort of project has been difficult, because “city regulations stood in the way.” As subsidized housing projects go — 512 units — this one is massive. Consider: Pueblo del Rio was 400 units, but across 18 acres; Rancho San Pedro was 285 units, across 13 acres; William Mead was 449 units, 15 acres; Estrada Courts, 214 units, 10 acres; Avalon Gardens, 164 units, 15 acres; Hacienda Village, 184 units, 18 acres; Imperial Courts, 498 units, across 36 acres; there’s another half-dozen examples but you get the idea. Consider the densest projects: Jordan Downs, with 700 units on 50 acres, therefore provided each unit 3,111 square feet of land, and it had to be torn down in part because it was too dense. The WTC project makes Jordan Downs look like freakin’ Alpine County.

So, removal of amenity spaces, without those pesky regulations…makes one wonder. Now, it seems that the Sheets mural will remain:

So that’s what they mean by “removal of amenity spaces on the concourse level
The Sheets mural would be in the middle area with the elongated “Xs” — just surrounded by a couple hundred micro-units of low-income tenancy.
You’ll never see it like this again

Now that brings us to today. They’re ramping up to begin Phase One, which is 241 units, located wholly in the area you seen in the image immediately above (the subsequent Phase Two, of 271 units, will presumably be in the adjacent office tower). I worry that come completion of the 241 units, access to the lobby will be limited, as will access to the pedways (and the pedways are both historic and awesome).

Of course, the Powers That Be have stated that this project will have “no significant impact on the human environment.” Which again redefines “embarrassingly stupid,” but it’s a statement straight outta Sacramento, so what else do you expect. Plus, they have a big fat 96-page report called a FONSI (Finding of No Significant Impact) and since my tax dollars paid for it, who would I be to disagree with…me?

Anyway:

This brings us around to the paragraph-in-red at the top of this post. Comments received on or before May 13 (basically tomorrow) “will be considered” even though the works is a done deal. Yep, that’s the one thing you can do: tell Elizabeth Brown, Loan Administrator, California Housing Finance Agency — eabrown@calhfa.ca.gov — that the mural and pedways should stay open and accessible. Now, Elizabeth Brown might be the nicest person in the world, but I doubt very much a Sacramento loan administrator for CalFHA will have much say in how the people of Los Angeles might enjoy a shared cultural resource. But it’s literally the only crumb they’ve tossed us, so, you never know! Get emailing!

One thought on “The World Trade Center — in Peril?!

Leave a comment